<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>What do you think? </title>
        <link>http://homefront.yuku.com/topic/1118/t/What-do-you-think-.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ 
.


1. I&#39;d like to see the show pushed forward 20 years. I have a few scenarios for 1967. Who would be running Sloan Industries in 1967? Would it be Charley
Haley?...we all know he married Gina, and in 1967 Emma would not be old/mature enough to handle the position, but she would be the rightful heir to the Sloan
buisness enterprises. Would the male children of for example, Charley and Gina, Jeff and Ginger, Ann &amp; Al Kahn&#39;s son Mike be involved in the Viet Nam
War? 


2. Would... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 23:06:16 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 18:24:04 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What do you think?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://homefront.yuku.com/reply/5970/t/What-do-you-think-.html#reply-5970</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <font face="serif" size="4">Beth,
<br>
<br></font><font face="serif"><font size="4"><strong><em>&quot;There must be union foremen in a variety of industries&quot;
<br>
<br></em></strong>I feel that I should come to your defense here. I think you&#39;re spot-on. I would think of a foreman position as being sort of an upper
level blue collar job. It would be hard to believe that there are absolutely <em>no</em> Union foremen in <em>any</em> industry where the workers have union
representation.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Derwenz)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://homefront.yuku.com/sreply/5970</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 16:39:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What do you think?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://homefront.yuku.com/reply/5969/t/What-do-you-think-.html#reply-5969</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Well, obviously, there are conflicts of interest. There must be union foremen in a variety of industries, however, or I wouldn&#39;t see so many references in
a simple Google search to &quot;union foremen&quot; and &quot;non-union foremen.&quot; ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (KirtlandHill)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://homefront.yuku.com/sreply/5969</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 13:29:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What do you think?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://homefront.yuku.com/reply/5965/t/What-do-you-think-.html#reply-5965</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I can see you never worked in a union shop. It&#39;s a big conflict of interest. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Randy Jay)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://homefront.yuku.com/sreply/5965</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:39:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What do you think?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://homefront.yuku.com/reply/5957/t/What-do-you-think-.html#reply-5957</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>Aren&#39;t foremen in some industries eligible for union membership? I have no idea --- and it hadn&#39;t really occured to me when I made my post that
Charlie might not be eligible to continue his membership in Local 411 if he accepted a promotion to foreman. They never really show us who were the foremen at
Sloan Industries; Sam was a personnel manager, while foreman would still be kind of a blue-collar job. When I Googled the words &quot;foreman&quot; and
&quot;union,&quot; references... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (KirtlandHill)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://homefront.yuku.com/sreply/5957</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:40:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What do you think?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://homefront.yuku.com/reply/5920/t/What-do-you-think-.html#reply-5920</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ If Charley was management, he couldn&#39;t be in the union. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Randy Jay)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://homefront.yuku.com/sreply/5920</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 22:53:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: What do you think?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://homefront.yuku.com/reply/5893/t/What-do-you-think-.html#reply-5893</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Great questions, Randy! And there&#39;s no way I can reply to all of them in one sitting, but I&#39;ll get started...
<br>

<blockquote>
  1. I&#39;d like to see the show pushed forward 20 years. I have a few scenarios for 1967. Who would be running Sloan Industries in 1967? Would it be Charley
  Haley?...we all know he married Gina, and in 1967 Emma would not be old/mature enough to handle the position, but she would be the rightful heir to the Sloan
  buisness enterprises. Would the male... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (KirtlandHill)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://homefront.yuku.com/sreply/5893</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:13:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ What do you think?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://homefront.yuku.com/topic/1118/t/What-do-you-think-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><br>
.
<br>
<br>
1. I&#39;d like to see the show pushed forward 20 years. I have a few scenarios for 1967. Who would be running Sloan Industries in 1967? Would it be Charley
Haley?...we all know he married Gina, and in 1967 Emma would not be old/mature enough to handle the position, but she would be the rightful heir to the Sloan
buisness enterprises. Would the male children of for example, Charley and Gina, Jeff and Ginger, Ann &amp; Al Kahn&#39;s son Mike be involved in the Viet Nam
War?... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Randy Jay)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://homefront.yuku.com/topic/1118</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 23:06:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>